The payroll taxes involved
| Tax | Employer rate | Wage base (2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Social Security (OASDI) | 6.2% | First $184,500 of wages |
| Medicare (HI) | 1.45% | All wages |
| Total employer FICA, most hourly workers | 7.65% | See above |
| FUTA | 6.0% (usually 0.6% after state credit) | First $7,000 |
Employees pay the same 7.65% FICA on their side.[1]
Step 1: the pre-tax premium lowers taxable wages
When an employee pays a premium through a Section 125 plan, that amount comes out before taxes, so neither side pays income tax withholding or FICA on it.[2, 3] This step is standard, and the IRS agrees with it.[2]
Employer FICA reduction per enrolled employee, per year = monthly pre-tax premium × 12 × 7.65%
Before program fees, for employees under the Social Security wage base, and only if benefit payments aren't treated as wages.[4]
Step 2: how benefit payments are taxed decides the outcome
In this design the carrier funds each claim payment and payroll passes it to the employee (Elysian-stated).[5] Elysian's tax counsel concluded that the payments are not wages.[6] The IRS Chief Counsel has taken a different written position: when an employee has no unreimbursed medical expense related to the payment, wellness-style indemnity payments under a pre-tax policy are taxable wages for FICA, FUTA and income tax withholding.[7, 8] This is a direct disagreement, and the employer carries the withholding and FICA risk.[8, 9]
Step 3: the employee's take-home formula
Change in monthly take-home pay = claim payments received − premium deducted + (premium × employee's combined tax rate)[10]
The employee comes out ahead only if the plan pays a claim close to the premium nearly every month. That monthly pattern is exactly what the IRS has questioned, which is why we show the formula instead of a promise.[10, 11] See the worked examples.
Other effects to know
- California workers' comp: qualifying Section 125 benefit deductions are excluded from workers' comp payroll if the employer keeps per-employee records, so premiums may drop. Outside California, don't assume a workers' comp saving.[12]
- Future Social Security: lower Social Security wages can mean slightly lower future benefits.[13]
- Fees: program fees are disclosed in the Financial Impact Statement. Compare them with the FICA reduction.[14]
- Downside: if the IRS disagrees, the employer can owe under-withheld income tax, both halves of FICA, FUTA, penalties and interest.[9]
Sources & footnotes
- Verified Employer FICA is 7.65% for most hourly workers. Social Security Administration — maximum taxable earnings; IRS Tax Topic 751 — Social Security and Medicare withholding rates. Proof library P-40
- Verified Step 1 — pre-tax premium through a Section 125 cafeteria plan. IRS Chief Counsel Advice 202323006; Elysian enrollment authorization (JobsRUs). Proof library P-30
- Verified Section 106: pre-tax health premiums are excluded from income. Treasury/DOL/HHS final rule, 89 FR 23338. Proof library P-47
- Analysis Employer FICA savings — how to estimate. Elysian benefits proposal (redacted client, provided by Elysian). Proof library P-41
- Elysian-stated Step 4 — the carrier funds the claim; payroll passes it through. Holland & Knight memorandum to Elysian Healthcare (confidential; available on request, subject to Elysian's permission). Proof library P-32
- Elysian-stated Step 5 — Elysian's counsel: claim payments are not wages. Holland & Knight memorandum to Elysian Healthcare (confidential; available on request, subject to Elysian's permission). Proof library P-33
- Verified CCA 202323006 — the key IRS memo. IRS CCA 202323006. Proof library P-58
- Verified FICA: the point where Elysian's counsel and the IRS disagree. IRS CCA 202323006; Holland & Knight memorandum to Elysian Healthcare (confidential; available on request, subject to Elysian's permission). Proof library P-51
- Verified What's at stake if the IRS disagrees. Morgan Lewis — ML BeneBits; Bloomberg Tax — HR Solutions That Become Tax Problems. Proof library P-63
- Analysis The take-home formula. Our analysis of P-30 and P-37. Proof library P-38
- Verified April 2024 final rule — IRS concern “recently escalated”. Treasury/DOL/HHS final rule, 89 FR 23338. Proof library P-60
- Verified California workers' comp may also drop. WCIRB California — Uniform Statistical Reporting Plan. Proof library P-42
- Analysis What employees should know. Elysian enrollment authorization (JobsRUs). Proof library P-39
- Pending NDA doc Program fees. Elysian Dealer FAQ. Proof library P-34